It's Over!

Hvor mye koster det?

Loosely translated, “ What’s the cost?” The United States 2014 midterm election is history and is proving to be the most expensive election in US history. Never mind that a presidential choice was not to be made. What’s the cost?

           How about SIX BILLION DOLLARS?

                    - -- - - - - - - -
Six billion dollars was spent to complete the process. Can you imagine the joy of charities, states and the economy if   any portion of six billion dollars is received rather than observe it being  given to a select few individuals? Obviously, the donors can afford the contributions and expect the recipient, after winning, to “ do them a favor”. In many cases, these billionaire donors are looking far ahead to future election gains . TV sets in the US have been inundated with political half-truths, negative, misleading and sometimes truthful ads. It’s finally over for a short time before it begins anew..

                                    - - - - - - - - - -

How much should it cost to choose our leaders? Six billion dollars for an ‘off-year’ is unthinkable in other countries. Rich US ‘Super-PACs’ pour in their money from secret sources for special TV biased ads.What do our neighboring countries do?  How do our Scandinavian friends do it fairly?

- - - - - - - - - -

In 2010, 74% of Norwegian campaign funds come from Norway’s government subsidization. The Scandinavian process, which depends on public funds rather than private funds for campaign financing, is believed to promote greater transparency in the process and reduce the dependency on corporate money. This is public fund campaign financing!  There are many different political parties in Norway. Norway has a multiparty system. When people go to vote, they have many alternatives from which to choose.
                                           21 parties!

 - - - - - - - - - -

 

Norway's  current government  is a coalition of the Conservatives and The Progress  Party. They don’t have a majority alone, but are supported in parliament by the centrist Liberal and Christian Democrats.  The European Union Committee of Ministers issued suggestions in 2003  requiring political parties of member nations to make their donations public, keep accurate records, prevent conflicts of interest, and maintain a fixed ceiling for donations.
And unlike in the U.S., where candidates and their supporters can buy as much television time as they can afford, political ads are banned from television and radio.   

 Political ads are banned from Norwegian television and radio?! 

And in Sweden....

 

Since the Great Depression, Swedish national politics has largely been dominated by the Social Democratic Workers' Party, which has held a plurality (and sometimes a majority) in parliament since 1917. The last Swedish general election was held on 14 September 2014.Unlike in many countries where voters chose from a list of candidates or parties, each party in Sweden has separate ballot papers. The ballot papers must be identical in
size and material, and have different colors depending on the type of election: yellow, blue,  and white for municipal elections and elections to the European Parliament.---Sweden has a problem--Swedish election policy of always displaying the ballot papers for voters to select in public, making it impossible for voters to vote secretly. This has been criticized as undemocratic. To confuse onlookers,  many use subterfuge and select bunches of additional ballots which they do not actually intend to use.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Denmark is roughly the size of Maryland in population and geography.and there are eight parties in their parliament  In the 2007 election, Denmark’s two leading parties combined, including their public financing, spent less than $8 million – a fraction of the $5.3 billion candidates spent on the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Danish law only requires political parties to file annual reports of contributors. Even then, parties need only name contributors who gave more than 20,000 Danish kroner (about $3,770). Anonymous contributions are also allowed, but only if the party does not know the identity of the donor. .But the biggest difference in a campaign season between our two countries is the money. With a ban on political TV ads in Denmark, cash plays a much smaller role in the blitz for votes here.
       And yes, again, Denmark bans political  TV ads.
There are eight political parties and every political party  in Denmark backs the ban on political ads. One major party leader recently called the ban “the best thing ever.”

- - - - - - - - - -

As we all know,  campaign advertising is the use of an advertising campaign through the media to influence political debate, and   ultimately, voters. In the EU, many countries do not permit paid-for TV or radio advertising for fear that wealthy groups will gain control of airtime making fair play impossible and distort the political debate in the process. In both the United Kingdom and Ireland, paid advertisements are forbidden, though political parties are allowed a small number of party political broadcasts in the run up to election time.

- - - - - - - - - -

In Nordic countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Finland and Iceland, which have high numbers of women in parliaments, political parties receive state subsidy or some form of assistance (e.g. free, equal broadcasting time on TV and radio for campaigns or party-related activities such as research.Public financing of campaigns is seen as democratic, fair and equitable as both women and men candidates and parties that qualify for government support are given equal amounts for campaigns, thus not only the “wealthy” or those with access to party coffers.

- - - - - - - - - -

Other countries encourage women to join the party!

In France, political parties which do not include 50% women in their party lists face sanctions such as reduction or withdrawal of campaign funding support from the government. Generally, public financing of campaigns refers to campaign money provided by the government to a candidate or political party. Public funds may be provided to cover a portion or all of the campaign costs by the candidate or political party. This seems to work well for our neighbors.

             Or, we can let rich corporations continue funding our future.